Result
India won by 31 runs
- Toss
- India won the toss and chose to bat.
- Player of the match
- CA Pujara
| Innings | Score | Overs |
|---|---|---|
| India (1) | 250 | 88.0 |
| Australia (2) | 235 | 98.4 |
| India (3) | 307 | 106.5 |
| Australia (4) | 291 | 119.5 |
Loading the scorecard…
Loading the charts…
Result
| Innings | Score | Overs |
|---|---|---|
| India (1) | 250 | 88.0 |
| Australia (2) | 235 | 98.4 |
| India (3) | 307 | 106.5 |
| Australia (4) | 291 | 119.5 |
Loading the scorecard…
Loading the charts…
Australia291 all out (119.5 ov)
| Batter | R | B | 4s | 6s | SR | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AJ Finchcaught b R Ashwin | 11 | 35 | 1 | 0 | 31.4 | |
| MS Harriscaught b Mohammed Shami | 26 | 49 | 3 | 0 | 53.1 | |
| UT Khawajacaught b R Ashwin | 8 | 42 | 0 | 0 | 19.0 | |
| SE Marshcaught b JJ Bumrah | 60 | 166 | 5 | 0 | 36.1 | |
| PSP Handscombcaught b Mohammed Shami | 14 | 40 | 1 | 0 | 35.0 | |
| TM Headcaught b I Sharma | 14 | 62 | 1 | 0 | 22.6 | |
| TD Painecaught b JJ Bumrah | 41 | 73 | 4 | 0 | 56.2 | |
| PJ Cumminscaught b JJ Bumrah | 28 | 121 | 3 | 0 | 23.1 | |
| MA Starccaught b Mohammed Shami | 28 | 44 | 3 | 0 | 63.6 | |
| NM Lyon*not out | 38 | 47 | 3 | 0 | 80.9 | |
| JR Hazlewoodcaught b R Ashwin | 13 | 43 | 1 | 0 | 30.2 | |
| Extras | 10 (b 1, lb 6, nb 3) | |||||
| Total | 291 all out (119.5 ov) | |||||
Fall of wickets: 1-28 (AJ Finch, 11.6 ov), 2-44 (MS Harris, 16.2 ov), 3-60 (UT Khawaja, 23.3 ov), 4-84 (PSP Handscomb, 36.5 ov), 5-115 (TM Head, 56.4 ov), 6-156 (SE Marsh, 72.1 ov), 7-187 (TD Paine, 84.1 ov), 8-228 (MA Starc, 100.4 ov), 9-259 (PJ Cummins, 108.4 ov), 10-291 (JR Hazlewood, 119.5 ov)
| Bowler | O | M | R | W | Econ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| I Sharma | 19 | 4 | 48 | 1 | 2.53 |
| JJ Bumrah | 24 | 8 | 68 | 3 | 2.83 |
| R Ashwin | 52.5 | 13 | 92 | 3 | 1.74 |
| Mohammed Shami | 20 | 4 | 65 | 3 | 3.25 |
| M Vijay | 4 | 0 | 11 | 0 | 2.75 |
Replays carry no fielders, so catches name only the bowler.
Win probability is modelled only for ODIs and T20Is. Tests can be drawn, so a two-outcome model does not fit them.