Result
India won by 238 runs
- Toss
- India won the toss and chose to bat.
- Player of the match
- SS Iyer
| Innings | Score | Overs |
|---|---|---|
| India (1) | 252 | 59.1 |
| Sri Lanka (2) | 109 | 35.5 |
| India (3) | 303/9d | 68.5 |
| Sri Lanka (4) | 208 | 59.3 |
Loading the scorecard…
Loading the charts…
Result
| Innings | Score | Overs |
|---|---|---|
| India (1) | 252 | 59.1 |
| Sri Lanka (2) | 109 | 35.5 |
| India (3) | 303/9d | 68.5 |
| Sri Lanka (4) | 208 | 59.3 |
Loading the scorecard…
Loading the charts…
Sri Lanka208 all out (59.3 ov)
| Batter | R | B | 4s | 6s | SR | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HDRL Thirimannelbw b JJ Bumrah | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | |
| FDM Karunaratneb JJ Bumrah | 107 | 174 | 15 | 0 | 61.5 | |
| BKG Mendisstumped b R Ashwin | 54 | 60 | 8 | 1 | 90.0 | |
| AD Mathewsb RA Jadeja | 1 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 20.0 | |
| DM de Silvacaught b R Ashwin | 4 | 21 | 0 | 0 | 19.0 | |
| N Dickwellastumped b AR Patel | 12 | 39 | 0 | 0 | 30.8 | |
| KIC Asalankacaught b AR Patel | 5 | 20 | 1 | 0 | 25.0 | |
| L Embuldeniyalbw b R Ashwin | 2 | 22 | 0 | 0 | 9.1 | |
| RAS Lakmalb JJ Bumrah | 1 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 25.0 | |
| MVT Fernandocaught b R Ashwin | 2 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 33.3 | |
| P Jayawickrama*not out | 0 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | |
| Extras | 20 (b 16, lb 3, nb 1) | |||||
| Total | 208 all out (59.3 ov) | |||||
Fall of wickets: 1-0 (HDRL Thirimanne, 0.3 ov), 2-97 (BKG Mendis, 19.4 ov), 3-98 (AD Mathews, 20.4 ov), 4-105 (DM de Silva, 27.5 ov), 5-160 (N Dickwella, 41.6 ov), 6-180 (KIC Asalanka, 49.5 ov), 7-204 (FDM Karunaratne, 56.5 ov), 8-206 (L Embuldeniya, 57.3 ov), 9-208 (RAS Lakmal, 58.2 ov), 10-208 (MVT Fernando, 59.3 ov)
| Bowler | O | M | R | W | Econ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JJ Bumrah | 9 | 4 | 23 | 3 | 2.56 |
| Mohammed Shami | 6 | 0 | 26 | 0 | 4.33 |
| R Ashwin | 19.3 | 3 | 55 | 4 | 2.82 |
| RA Jadeja | 14 | 2 | 48 | 1 | 3.43 |
| AR Patel | 11 | 1 | 37 | 2 | 3.36 |
Replays carry no fielders, so catches name only the bowler.
Win probability is modelled only for ODIs and T20Is. Tests can be drawn, so a two-outcome model does not fit them.