Criclysis: international cricket analytics

A Mare, Women's T20I

Full profile →

Bowling to them: where to attack

Pace: average of 9.2, 3.6 below their average of 12.8 on all balls faced (-28%) — allowing for sample size, that change is in the bottom 6% of comparable players (their median change: +4%) — 158 balls faced.
Sample: 158 balls · low confidence

Bowling to them: what to avoid

Chasing: average of 13.9, 1.1 above their average of 12.8 on all balls faced (+9%) — allowing for sample size, that change is in the top 28% of comparable players (their median change: -3%) — 209 balls faced.
Sample: 209 balls · low confidence

Batting against them: where they leak

No bowling weakness clears the thresholds in this format.

Batting against them: where they are strongest

No bowling strength clears the thresholds in this format.

Their batting against each bowling type and phase

Bowling type
Bowling type	Balls	Runs	Outs	Avg	SR	Dot %	4s+6s %
Right-arm medium	109	68	10	6.80	62.39	56.9%	7.3%

Phase
Phase	Balls	Runs	Outs	Avg	SR	Dot %	4s+6s %
Middle (7-15)	142	101	7	14.43	71.13	50.0%	6.3%
Death (16-20)	86	65	5	13.00	75.58	44.2%	5.8%

Their bowling by batter hand and phase

Batter
Batter	Balls	Runs	Wkts	Avg	Econ	Balls/wkt	Dot %	4s+6s %
Right-handed batters	225	179	11	16.27	4.77	20.5	59.6%	7.1%

Phase
Phase	Balls	Runs	Wkts	Avg	Econ	Balls/wkt	Dot %	4s+6s %
Powerplay (1-6)	180	184	9	20.44	6.13	20.0	59.4%	11.7%
Middle (7-15)	102	88	3	29.33	5.18	34.0	53.9%	7.8%