Strategy

Plans built only from the evidence.

Every line below is a measured split or record from the data, with the sample behind it. Nothing here is a prediction.

Diana Baig, Women's T20I

No batting weakness clears the thresholds in this format.

No batting strength clears the thresholds in this format.

No bowling weakness clears the thresholds in this format.

Away from home: average of 27.3, 3.5 below their average of 30.8 on all balls bowled (-11%) — allowing for sample size, that change is in the top 19% of comparable players (their median change: +1%) — 740 balls bowled.
Sample: 740 balls · high confidence
Right-handed batters: average of 29.0, 1.8 below their average of 30.8 on all balls bowled (-6%) — allowing for sample size, that change is in the top 25% of comparable players (their median change: -1%) — 812 balls bowled.
Sample: 812 balls · high confidence
Powerplay (1-6): economy of 5.83, 0.88 below their economy of 6.71 on all balls bowled (-13%) — allowing for sample size, that change is in the top 12% of comparable players (their median change: -4%) — 655 balls bowled.
Sample: 655 balls · medium confidence

Not enough balls: splits are shown from 60 balls faced.

Phase
Phase	Balls	Runs	Outs	Avg	SR	Dot %	4s+6s %
Death (16-20)	95	59	11	5.36	62.11	40.0%	1.1%

Batter
Batter	Balls	Runs	Wkts	Avg	Econ	Balls/wkt	Dot %	4s+6s %
Right-handed batters	812	929	32	29.03	6.86	25.4	46.2%	15.9%
Left-handed batters	153	150	3	50.00	5.88	51.0	52.9%	13.1%

Phase
Phase	Balls	Runs	Wkts	Avg	Econ	Balls/wkt	Dot %	4s+6s %
Powerplay (1-6)	655	636	20	31.80	5.83	32.8	55.3%	13.9%
Death (16-20)	196	283	12	23.58	8.66	16.3	30.6%	18.4%
Middle (7-15)	114	160	3	53.33	8.42	38.0	29.8%	19.3%