Strategy

Plans built only from the evidence.

Every line below is a measured split or record from the data, with the sample behind it. Nothing here is a prediction.

FG Kemp, Women's T20I

New at the crease (first 15 balls): balls per dismissal of 17, 4 below their balls per dismissal of 21 on all balls faced (-18%) — allowing for sample size, that change is in the bottom 3% of comparable players (their median change: +8%) — 190 balls faced.
Sample: 190 balls · low confidence

England: average of 40.4, 9.9 above their average of 30.5 on all balls faced (+32%) — allowing for sample size, that change is in the top 15% of comparable players (their median change: -2%) — 197 balls faced.
Sample: 197 balls · low confidence
At home: average of 40.4, 9.9 above their average of 30.5 on all balls faced (+32%) — allowing for sample size, that change is in the top 22% of comparable players (their median change: +3%) — 197 balls faced.
Sample: 197 balls · low confidence

No bowling weakness clears the thresholds in this format.

No bowling strength clears the thresholds in this format.

Not enough balls: splits are shown from 60 balls faced.

Phase
Phase	Balls	Runs	Outs	Avg	SR	Dot %	4s+6s %
Death (16-20)	132	212	3	70.67	160.61	22.7%	21.2%
Middle (7-15)	97	124	7	17.71	127.84	35.1%	16.5%

Batter
Batter	Balls	Runs	Wkts	Avg	Econ	Balls/wkt	Dot %	4s+6s %
Right-handed batters	385	490	24	20.42	7.64	16.0	37.9%	16.9%

Phase
Phase	Balls	Runs	Wkts	Avg	Econ	Balls/wkt	Dot %	4s+6s %
Middle (7-15)	234	294	18	16.33	7.54	13.0	38.9%	15.4%
Death (16-20)	126	160	9	17.78	7.62	14.0	34.9%	14.3%
Powerplay (1-6)	114	160	3	53.33	8.42	38.0	43.9%	24.6%