Criclysis: international cricket analytics

G Wareham, Women's T20I

Full profile →

Bowling to them: where to attack

No batting weakness clears the thresholds in this format.

Bowling to them: what to avoid

Spin: average of 28.0, 11.2 above their average of 16.8 on all balls faced (+67%) — allowing for sample size, that change is in the top 1% of comparable players (their median change: -6%) — 157 balls faced.
Sample: 157 balls · low confidence

Batting against them: where they leak

Middle (7-15): strike rate of 19.3, 3.3 above their strike rate of 16.0 on all balls bowled (+21%) — allowing for sample size, that change is in the bottom 25% of comparable players (their median change: +8%) — 1080 balls bowled.
Sample: 1,080 balls · high confidence

Batting against them: where they are strongest

Death (16-20): strike rate of 9.4, 6.6 below their strike rate of 16.0 on all balls bowled (-41%) — allowing for sample size, that change is in the top 27% of comparable players (their median change: -16%) — 264 balls bowled.
Sample: 264 balls · low confidence

Their batting against each bowling type and phase

Bowling type
Bowling type	Balls	Runs	Outs	Avg	SR	Dot %	4s+6s %
Right-arm medium	78	110	7	15.71	141.03	34.6%	21.8%

Phase
Phase	Balls	Runs	Outs	Avg	SR	Dot %	4s+6s %
Death (16-20)	147	214	16	13.38	145.58	27.2%	19.7%
Middle (7-15)	117	171	7	24.43	146.15	29.9%	22.2%

Their bowling by batter hand and phase

Batter
Batter	Balls	Runs	Wkts	Avg	Econ	Balls/wkt	Dot %	4s+6s %
Right-handed batters	1,184	1,173	72	16.29	5.94	16.4	43.1%	9.6%
Left-handed batters	160	168	12	14.00	6.30	13.3	38.8%	10.6%

Phase
Phase	Balls	Runs	Wkts	Avg	Econ	Balls/wkt	Dot %	4s+6s %
Middle (7-15)	1,080	1,093	56	19.52	6.07	19.3	41.2%	10.0%
Death (16-20)	264	248	28	8.86	5.64	9.4	48.1%	8.7%