Criclysis: international cricket analytics

L Ostergaard, Women's T20I

Full profile →

Bowling to them: where to attack

Pace: average of 9.8, 2.1 below their average of 11.8 on all balls faced (-18%) — allowing for sample size, that change is in the bottom 10% of comparable players (their median change: +4%) — 211 balls faced.
Sample: 211 balls · low confidence

Bowling to them: what to avoid

Chasing: average of 13.2, 1.4 above their average of 11.8 on all balls faced (+12%) — allowing for sample size, that change is in the top 23% of comparable players (their median change: -3%) — 251 balls faced.
Sample: 251 balls · medium confidence

Batting against them: where they leak

No bowling weakness clears the thresholds in this format.

Batting against them: where they are strongest

No bowling strength clears the thresholds in this format.

Their batting against each bowling type and phase

Bowling type
Bowling type	Balls	Runs	Outs	Avg	SR	Dot %	4s+6s %
Right-arm fast-medium	101	54	6	9.00	53.47	55.4%	2.0%
Right-arm medium	88	44	4	11.00	50.00	54.5%	1.1%

Phase
Phase	Balls	Runs	Outs	Avg	SR	Dot %	4s+6s %
Middle (7-15)	178	101	9	11.22	56.74	52.2%	3.4%
Powerplay (1-6)	121	73	6	12.17	60.33	54.5%	3.3%

Their bowling by batter hand and phase

Batter
Batter	Balls	Runs	Wkts	Avg	Econ	Balls/wkt	Dot %	4s+6s %
Right-handed batters	239	186	11	16.91	4.67	21.7	53.1%	6.3%

Phase
Phase	Balls	Runs	Wkts	Avg	Econ	Balls/wkt	Dot %	4s+6s %
Middle (7-15)	204	145	9	16.11	4.26	22.7	56.9%	4.4%
Death (16-20)	151	148	6	24.67	5.88	25.2	47.0%	11.3%