| Format | Mat | Inns | NO | Runs | HS | Avg | SR | 100/50 | Balls | Wkts | BBI | Avg | Econ | 5w |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Test (shown below) | 2 | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | 335 | 1 | 1/141 | 214.00 | 3.83 | 0 |
| ODI | 6 | 6 | 0 | 77 | 46 | 12.83 | 67.54 | 0/0 | 270 | 5 | 3/31 | 36.60 | 4.07 | 0 |
Loading GM Ewing's Test analysis…
Loading strengths and weaknesses…
Loading matchups…
India
Opposition · average
89th percentile among comparable players
India: average of 141.0, 73.0 below their average of 214.0 on all balls bowled (-34%) — allowing for sample size, that change is in the top 11% of comparable players (their median change: +5%) — 251 balls bowled.
251 ballsLow confidence
At home
Home or away · average
83rd percentile among comparable players
At home: average of 141.0, 73.0 below their average of 214.0 on all balls bowled (-34%) — allowing for sample size, that change is in the top 17% of comparable players (their median change: -5%) — 251 balls bowled.
251 ballsLow confidence
None in this format: no split clears the sample and percentile thresholds.
| Measure | Value | Percentile | Balls |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wicket taking (bowling) | 335.00 | 0 | 335 |
| Economy (bowling) | 3.83 | 10 | 335 |
| Bowling average (bowling) | 214.00 | 0 | 335 |
| To left-handers (bowling) | 83.00 | 2 | 161 |
| Dot pressure (bowling) | 68.66 | 19 | 335 |
| Batter | Balls | Runs | Wkts | Avg | Econ | Balls/wkt | Dot % | 4s+6s % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Right-handed batters | 174 | 131 | 0 | – | 4.52 | – | 64.4% | 10.9% |
| Left-handed batters | 161 | 83 | 1 | 83.00 | 3.09 | 161.0 | 73.3% | 5.6% |
| Phase | Balls | Runs | Wkts | Avg | Econ | Balls/wkt | Dot % | 4s+6s % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Old ball (21-80) | 209 | 139 | 0 | – | 3.99 | – | 67.5% | 8.6% |
| Second new ball (81+) | 126 | 75 | 1 | 75.00 | 3.57 | 126.0 | 70.6% | 7.9% |
| Opposition | Balls | Runs | Wkts | Avg | Econ | Balls/wkt | Dot % | 4s+6s % |
|---|
| Year | Inns | Runs | Avg | SR | Bowl inns | Wkts | Bowl avg | Econ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2003 | – | – | – | – | 2 | 0 | – | 5.21 |
| 2005 | – | – | – | – | 1 | 1 | 141.00 | 3.37 |
| Date | Opposition | Balls | Maidens | Runs | Wkts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 13 Sept 2005 | India | 251 | 5 | 141 | 1 |
| 17 Oct 2003 | Australia | 66 | 1 | 53 | 0 |
| 17 Oct 2003 | Australia | 18 | 0 | 20 | 0 |
1 wickets
| India | 251 | 141 | 1 | 141.00 | 3.37 | 251.0 | 69.3% | 6.8% |
|---|
| Context | Balls | Runs | Wkts | Avg | Econ | Balls/wkt | Dot % | 4s+6s % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| At home | 251 | 141 | 1 | 141.00 | 3.37 | 251.0 | 69.3% | 6.8% |
| Innings 2 | 317 | 194 | 1 | 194.00 | 3.67 | 317.0 | 69.1% | 8.2% |
| Host country | Balls | Runs | Wkts | Avg | Econ | Balls/wkt | Dot % | 4s+6s % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Zimbabwe | 251 | 141 | 1 | 141.00 | 3.37 | 251.0 | 69.3% | 6.8% |
Not enough balls: bowling splits are shown from 90 balls bowled.