| Format | Mat | Inns | NO | Runs | HS | Avg | SR | 100/50 | Balls | Wkts | BBI | Avg | Econ | 5w |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Test (shown below) | 2 | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | 260 | 3 | 2/43 | 56.67 | 3.92 | 0 |
| ODI | 5 | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | 199 | 9 | 4/72 | 27.22 | 7.39 | 0 |
| T20I | 22 | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | 436 | 20 | 4/20 | 32.50 | 8.94 | 0 |
Loading KT Maphaka's Test analysis…
Loading strengths and weaknesses…
Loading matchups…
None in this format: no split clears the sample and percentile thresholds.
None in this format: no split clears the sample and percentile thresholds.
| Measure | Value | Percentile | Balls |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wicket taking (bowling) | 86.67 | 16 | 260 |
| Economy (bowling) | 3.92 | 7 | 260 |
| Bowling average (bowling) | 56.67 | 7 | 260 |
| To right-handers (bowling) | 45.00 | 23 | 133 |
| To left-handers (bowling) | 79.00 | 2 | 123 |
| Dot pressure (bowling) | 63.08 | 4 | 260 |
| Batter | Balls | Runs | Wkts | Avg | Econ | Balls/wkt | Dot % | 4s+6s % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Right-handed batters | 133 | 90 | 2 | 45.00 | 4.06 | 66.5 | 65.4% | 8.3% |
| Left-handed batters | 123 | 79 | 1 | 79.00 | 3.85 | 123.0 | 60.2% | 7.3% |
| Phase | Balls | Runs | Wkts | Avg | Econ | Balls/wkt | Dot % | 4s+6s % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Old ball (21-80) | 152 | 97 | 2 | 48.50 | 3.83 | 76.0 | 61.8% | 7.2% |
| Opposition | Balls | Runs | Wkts | Avg | Econ | Balls/wkt | Dot % | 4s+6s % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Zimbabwe | 132 | 80 | 0 | – | 3.64 | – | 72.7% |
| Year | Inns | Runs | Avg | SR | Bowl inns | Wkts | Bowl avg | Econ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | – | – | – | – | 4 | 3 | 56.67 | 3.92 |
| Date | Opposition | Balls | Maidens | Runs | Wkts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 28 Jun 2025 | Zimbabwe | 72 | 1 | 52 | 0 |
| 28 Jun 2025 | Zimbabwe | 60 | 3 | 28 | 0 |
| 3 Jan 2025 | Pakistan | 50 | 1 | 43 | 2 |
| 3 Jan 2025 | Pakistan | 78 | 0 | 47 | 1 |
3 wickets
| 9.1% |
| Pakistan | 128 | 90 | 3 | 30.00 | 4.22 | 42.7 | 53.1% | 6.3% |
|---|
| Context | Balls | Runs | Wkts | Avg | Econ | Balls/wkt | Dot % | 4s+6s % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Away from home | 132 | 80 | 0 | – | 3.64 | – | 72.7% | 9.1% |
| At home | 128 | 90 | 3 | 30.00 | 4.22 | 42.7 | 53.1% | 6.3% |
| Innings 2 | 122 | 95 | 2 | 47.50 | 4.67 | 61.0 | 61.5% | 10.7% |
| Host country | Balls | Runs | Wkts | Avg | Econ | Balls/wkt | Dot % | 4s+6s % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Zimbabwe | 132 | 80 | 0 | – | 3.64 | – | 72.7% | 9.1% |
| South Africa | 128 | 90 | 3 | 30.00 | 4.22 | 42.7 | 53.1% | 6.3% |
Not enough balls: bowling splits are shown from 90 balls bowled.