| Format | Mat | Inns | NO | Runs | HS | Avg | SR | 100/50 | Balls | Wkts | BBI | Avg | Econ | 5w |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Test | 2 | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | 450 | 3 | 2/12 | 78.33 | 3.13 | 0 |
| ODI | 100 | 32 | 16 | 174 | 21 | 10.88 | 66.16 | 0/0 | 5,009 | 154 | 5/47 | 24.06 | 4.44 | 2 |
| T20I (shown below) | 19 | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | 377 | 19 | 3/11 | 23.05 | 6.97 | 0 |
Loading NW Bracken's T20I analysis…
Loading strengths and weaknesses…
Loading matchups…
None in this format: no split clears the sample and percentile thresholds.
Away from home
Home or away · average
8th percentile among comparable players
Away from home: average of 32.7, 9.6 above their average of 23.1 on all balls bowled (+42%) — allowing for sample size, that change is in the bottom 8% of comparable players (their median change: +1%) — 248 balls bowled.
248 ballsLow confidence
| Measure | Value | Percentile | Balls |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wicket taking (bowling) | 19.84 | 26 | 377 |
| Economy (bowling) | 6.97 | 63 | 377 |
| Bowling average (bowling) | 23.05 | 37 | 377 |
| To right-handers (bowling) | 22.08 | 50 | 249 |
| To left-handers (bowling) | 24.71 | 35 | 128 |
| Dot pressure (bowling) | 42.71 | 60 | 377 |
| Batter | Balls | Runs | Wkts | Avg | Econ | Balls/wkt | Dot % | 4s+6s % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Right-handed batters | 249 | 265 | 12 | 22.08 | 6.39 | 20.8 | 45.4% | 12.9% |
| Left-handed batters | 128 | 173 | 7 | 24.71 | 8.11 | 18.3 | 37.5% | 17.2% |
| Phase | Balls | Runs | Wkts | Avg | Econ | Balls/wkt | Dot % | 4s+6s % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Powerplay (1-6) | 204 | 189 | 9 | 21.00 | 5.56 | 22.7 | 55.9% | 11.8% |
| Death (16-20) | 107 | 168 | 8 | 21.00 | 9.42 | 13.4 | 25.2% | 18.7% |
| Opposition | Balls | Runs | Wkts | Avg | Econ | Balls/wkt | Dot % | 4s+6s % |
|---|
| Year | Inns | Runs | Avg | SR | Bowl inns | Wkts | Bowl avg | Econ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006 | – | – | – | – | 2 | 3 | 17.67 | 7.57 |
| 2007 | – | – | – | – | 9 | 9 | 21.00 | 6.44 |
| 2008 | – | – | – | – | 1 | 3 | 3.67 | 4.40 |
| 2009 | – | – | – | – | 7 | 4 | 46.25 | 7.71 |
| Date | Opposition | Balls | Maidens | Runs | Wkts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 8 Jun 2009 | Sri Lanka | 24 | 0 | 33 | 0 |
| 6 Jun 2009 | West Indies | 12 | 0 | 21 | 0 |
| 7 May 2009 | Pakistan | 18 | 0 | 24 | 0 |
| 29 Mar 2009 | South Africa | 24 | 0 | 44 | 1 |
| 15 Feb 2009 | New Zealand | 24 | 1 | 16 | 0 |
| 13 Jan 2009 | South Africa | 24 | 0 | 29 | 1 |
19 wickets
| South Africa | 108 | 144 | 7 | 20.57 | 8.00 | 15.4 | 41.7% | 16.7% |
|---|
| Context | Balls | Runs | Wkts | Avg | Econ | Balls/wkt | Dot % | 4s+6s % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Away from home | 248 | 327 | 10 | 32.70 | 7.91 | 24.8 | 38.3% | 17.3% |
| At home | 129 | 111 | 9 | 12.33 | 5.16 | 14.3 | 51.2% | 8.5% |
| Innings 2 | 203 | 228 | 6 | 38.00 | 6.74 | 33.8 | 44.3% | 13.8% |
| Innings 1 | 174 | 210 | 13 | 16.15 | 7.24 | 13.4 | 40.8% | 14.9% |
| Host country | Balls | Runs | Wkts | Avg | Econ | Balls/wkt | Dot % | 4s+6s % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| South Africa | 182 | 230 | 10 | 23.00 | 7.58 | 18.2 | 40.7% | 16.5% |
| Australia | 129 | 111 | 9 | 12.33 | 5.16 | 14.3 | 51.2% | 8.5% |
Not enough balls: bowling splits are shown from 90 balls bowled.
| South Africa |
| 18 |
| 0 |
| 18 |
| 2 |
| 1 Feb 2008 | India | 15 | 1 | 11 | 3 |
|---|
| 11 Dec 2007 | New Zealand | 12 | 0 | 8 | 0 |
|---|
| 20 Oct 2007 | India | 12 | 0 | 19 | 0 |
|---|
| 22 Sept 2007 | India | 24 | 0 | 38 | 0 |
|---|
| 20 Sept 2007 | Sri Lanka | 21 | 0 | 14 | 2 |
|---|
| 18 Sept 2007 | Pakistan | 24 | 0 | 35 | 0 |
|---|
| 16 Sept 2007 | Bangladesh | 18 | 0 | 14 | 2 |
|---|
| 14 Sept 2007 | England | 24 | 0 | 16 | 3 |
|---|
| 12 Sept 2007 | Zimbabwe | 23 | 0 | 25 | 1 |
|---|
| 9 Jan 2007 | England | 18 | 0 | 20 | 1 |
|---|
| 24 Feb 2006 | South Africa | 24 | 0 | 44 | 1 |
|---|
| 9 Jan 2006 | South Africa | 18 | 0 | 9 | 2 |
|---|
