| Format | Mat | Inns | NO | Runs | HS | Avg | SR | 100/50 | Balls | Wkts | BBI | Avg | Econ | 5w |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ODI | 6 | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | 251 | 6 | 2/32 | 31.83 | 4.57 | 0 |
| T20I (shown below) | 7 | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | 132 | 5 | 2/31 | 43.40 | 9.86 | 0 |
Loading T Muzarabani's T20I analysis…
Loading strengths and weaknesses…
Loading matchups…
None in this format: no split clears the sample and percentile thresholds.
None in this format: no split clears the sample and percentile thresholds.
Not enough balls in this format to place the player in a cohort.
| Batter | Balls | Runs | Wkts | Avg | Econ | Balls/wkt | Dot % | 4s+6s % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Right-handed batters | 100 | 170 | 3 | 56.67 | 10.20 | 33.3 | 28.0% | 26.0% |
Not enough balls: bowling splits are shown from 90 balls bowled.
Not enough balls: bowling splits are shown from 90 balls bowled.
| Context | Balls | Runs | Wkts | Avg | Econ | Balls/wkt | Dot % | 4s+6s % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| At home | 90 | 141 | 4 | 35.25 | 9.40 | 22.5 | 32.2% | 23.3% |
| Host country | Balls | Runs | Wkts | Avg | Econ | Balls/wkt | Dot % | 4s+6s % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Zimbabwe | 90 | 141 | 4 | 35.25 | 9.40 | 22.5 | 32.2% | 23.3% |
Not enough balls: bowling splits are shown from 90 balls bowled.
| Year | Inns | Runs | Avg | SR | Bowl inns | Wkts | Bowl avg | Econ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2015 | – | – | – | – | 3 | 2 | 46.50 | 10.33 |
| 2016 | – | – | – | – | 4 | 3 | 41.33 | 9.54 |
| Date | Opposition | Balls | Maidens | Runs | Wkts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 20 Jun 2016 | India | 12 | 0 | 17 | 0 |
| 18 Jun 2016 | India | 24 | 0 | 31 | 2 |
| 20 Jan 2016 | Bangladesh | 18 | 0 | 41 | 0 |
| 17 Jan 2016 | Bangladesh | 24 | 0 | 35 | 1 |
| 9 Aug 2015 | New Zealand | 18 | 0 | 34 | 1 |
| 19 Jul 2015 | India | 18 | 0 | 23 | 1 |
5 wickets
| India |
| 18 |
| 0 |
| 36 |
| 0 |