| Format | Mat | Inns | NO | Runs | HS | Avg | SR | 100/50 | Balls | Wkts | BBI | Avg | Econ | 5w |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ODI (shown below) | 5 | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | 264 | 5 | 2/41 | 49.80 | 5.66 | 0 |
Loading TS Nethula's ODI analysis…
Loading strengths and weaknesses…
Loading matchups…
Middle (11-40)
Match phase · strike rate
94th percentile among comparable players
Middle (11-40): strike rate of 48.0, 4.8 below their strike rate of 52.8 on all balls bowled (-9%) — allowing for sample size, that change is in the top 6% of comparable players (their median change: +12%) — 240 balls bowled.
240 ballsLow confidence
None in this format: no split clears the sample and percentile thresholds.
| Measure | Value | Percentile | Balls |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wicket taking (bowling) | 52.80 | 12 | 264 |
| Economy (bowling) | 5.66 | 18 | 264 |
| Bowling average (bowling) | 49.80 | 5 | 264 |
| To right-handers (bowling) | 45.75 | 11 | 220 |
| Dot pressure (bowling) | 49.62 | 25 | 264 |
| Batter | Balls | Runs | Wkts | Avg | Econ | Balls/wkt | Dot % | 4s+6s % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Right-handed batters | 220 | 183 | 4 | 45.75 | 4.99 | 55.0 | 49.1% | 6.8% |
| Phase | Balls | Runs | Wkts | Avg | Econ | Balls/wkt | Dot % | 4s+6s % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Middle (11-40) | 240 | 217 | 5 | 43.40 | 5.42 | 48.0 | 51.7% | 8.3% |
| Opposition | Balls | Runs | Wkts | Avg | Econ | Balls/wkt | Dot % | 4s+6s % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Zimbabwe | 120 | 96 | 2 | 48.00 | 4.80 | 60.0 | 48.3% | 5.8% |
| Context | Balls | Runs |
|---|
| Year | Inns | Runs | Avg | SR | Bowl inns | Wkts | Bowl avg | Econ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2012 | – | – | – | – | 5 | 5 | 49.80 | 5.66 |
| Date | Opposition | Balls | Maidens | Runs | Wkts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7 Jul 2012 | West Indies | 60 | 1 | 66 | 1 |
| 5 Jul 2012 | West Indies | 24 | 1 | 27 | 0 |
| 29 Feb 2012 | South Africa | 60 | 0 | 60 | 2 |
| 9 Feb 2012 | Zimbabwe | 60 | 1 | 41 | 2 |
| 6 Feb 2012 | Zimbabwe | 60 | 0 | 55 | 0 |
5 wickets
| Wkts |
|---|
| Avg |
|---|
| Econ |
|---|
| Balls/wkt |
|---|
| Dot % |
|---|
| 4s+6s % |
|---|
| At home | 180 | 156 | 4 | 39.00 | 5.20 | 45.0 | 46.1% | 6.7% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Innings 2 | 204 | 183 | 4 | 45.75 | 5.38 | 51.0 | 48.5% | 8.3% |
| Host country | Balls | Runs | Wkts | Avg | Econ | Balls/wkt | Dot % | 4s+6s % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| New Zealand | 180 | 156 | 4 | 39.00 | 5.20 | 45.0 | 46.1% | 6.7% |
Not enough balls: bowling splits are shown from 90 balls bowled.