| Format | Mat | Inns | NO | Runs | HS | Avg | SR | 100/50 | Balls | Wkts | BBI | Avg | Econ | 5w |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ODI | 17 | 13 | 2 | 101 | 25 | 9.18 | 57.71 | 0/0 | 603 | 13 | 3/10 | 32.23 | 4.17 | 0 |
| T20I (shown below) | 6 | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | 119 | 8 | 2/26 | 17.12 | 6.91 | 0 |
Loading WK McCallan's T20I analysis…
Loading strengths and weaknesses…
Loading matchups…
None in this format: no split clears the sample and percentile thresholds.
None in this format: no split clears the sample and percentile thresholds.
Not enough balls in this format to place the player in a cohort.
| Batter | Balls | Runs | Wkts | Avg | Econ | Balls/wkt | Dot % | 4s+6s % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Right-handed batters | 109 | 125 | 7 | 17.86 | 6.88 | 15.6 | 33.9% | 10.1% |
Not enough balls: bowling splits are shown from 90 balls bowled.
Not enough balls: bowling splits are shown from 90 balls bowled.
| Context | Balls | Runs | Wkts | Avg | Econ | Balls/wkt | Dot % | 4s+6s % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Away from home | 117 | 137 | 8 | 17.13 | 7.03 | 14.6 | 31.6% | 10.3% |
| Innings 1 | 98 | 109 | 7 | 15.57 | 6.67 | 14.0 | 33.7% | 10.2% |
| Host country | Balls | Runs | Wkts | Avg | Econ | Balls/wkt | Dot % | 4s+6s % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| England | 117 | 137 | 8 | 17.13 | 7.03 | 14.6 | 31.6% | 10.3% |
Not enough balls: bowling splits are shown from 90 balls bowled.
| Year | Inns | Runs | Avg | SR | Bowl inns | Wkts | Bowl avg | Econ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 | – | – | – | – | 1 | 0 | – | 0.00 |
| 2009 | – | – | – | – | 5 | 8 | 17.13 | 7.03 |
| Date | Opposition | Balls | Maidens | Runs | Wkts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 15 Jun 2009 | Pakistan | 24 | 0 | 26 | 2 |
| 14 Jun 2009 | Sri Lanka | 24 | 0 | 33 | 2 |
| 11 Jun 2009 | New Zealand | 24 | 0 | 33 | 2 |
| 10 Jun 2009 | India | 21 | 0 | 28 | 1 |
| 8 Jun 2009 | Bangladesh | 24 | 0 | 17 | 1 |
| 4 Aug 2008 | Kenya | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
8 wickets