Men's cricket

L Vincent

Lou VincentNew Zealand · Batter · Right-hand bat · Right-arm mediumFirst match in the data 29 Dec 2002 · last 16 Dec 2007 · Men's Test ball-by-ball coverage since 19 Dec 2001

Data: Cricsheet (CC BY 4.0), matches up to 2 Nov 2026.

Career by format

Only matches with ball-by-ball records are counted.

Career by format
Format	Mat	Inns	NO	Runs	HS	Avg	SR	100/50
Test (shown below)	7	10	0	590	224	59.00	56.03	2/2
ODI	48	45	4	1,089	102	26.56	71.60	2/6
T20I	9	9	0	174	42	19.33	100.00	0/0

Matches: 7Men's Test
Runs: 590avg 59.00 · SR 56.03 · 1,053 balls
100s / 50s: 2 / 2HS 224

Strengths and weaknesses

Measured against men's Test players with comparable samples. Strengths sit at or above the 70th percentile, weaknesses at or below the 30th.

How these are computed

Strengths(8)

Sri Lanka
Opposition · average
100th pct.
This split
224.00
Own baseline
59.00
Cohort median
33.80
100th percentile among comparable players
Sri Lanka: average of 224.0, 165.0 above their average of 59.0 on all balls faced (+280%) — allowing for sample size, that change is in the top 1% of comparable players (their median change: +4%) — 348 balls faced.
348 ballsMedium confidence
Spin
Pace or spin · average
98th pct.
This split
126.00
Own baseline
59.00
Cohort median
32.77
98th percentile among comparable players
Spin: average of 126.0, 67.0 above their average of 59.0 on all balls faced (+114%) — allowing for sample size, that change is in the top 2% of comparable players (their median change: +8%) — 442 balls faced.
442 ballsMedium confidence
Leg break
Bowling type · average
95th pct.
This split
158.00
Own baseline
59.00
Cohort median
35.67
95th percentile among comparable players
Leg break: average of 158.0, 99.0 above their average of 59.0 on all balls faced (+168%) — allowing for sample size, that change is in the top 5% of comparable players (their median change: +11%) — 317 balls faced.
317 ballsMedium confidence
India
Country · average
93rd pct.
This split
106.00
Own baseline
59.00
Cohort median
29.48
93rd percentile among comparable players
India: average of 106.0, 47.0 above their average of 59.0 on all balls faced (+80%) — allowing for sample size, that change is in the top 7% of comparable players (their median change: -6%) — 227 balls faced.
227 ballsMedium confidence
India
Opposition · average
92nd pct.
This split
106.00
Own baseline
59.00
Cohort median
28.34
92nd percentile among comparable players
India: average of 106.0, 47.0 above their average of 59.0 on all balls faced (+80%) — allowing for sample size, that change is in the top 9% of comparable players (their median change: -5%) — 227 balls faced.
227 ballsMedium confidence
Once set (40+ balls)
Stage of innings · balls per dismissal
70th pct.
This split
123.67
Own baseline
105.30
Cohort median
61.80
70th percentile among comparable players
Once set (40+ balls): balls per dismissal of 124, 18 above their balls per dismissal of 105 on all balls faced (+17%) — allowing for sample size, that change is in the top 30% of comparable players (their median change: +5%) — 742 balls faced.
742 ballsHigh confidence
Second new ball (81+)
Match phase · strike rate
99th pct.
This split
86.31
Own baseline
56.03
Cohort median
53.32
99th percentile among comparable players
Second new ball (81+): strike rate of 86.3, 30.3 above their strike rate of 56.0 on all balls faced (+54%) — allowing for sample size, that change is in the top 1% of comparable players (their median change: +4%) — 168 balls faced.
168 ballsLow confidence
Second new ball (81+)
Match phase · average
95th pct.
This split
145.00
Own baseline
59.00
Cohort median
34.23
95th percentile among comparable players
Second new ball (81+): average of 145.0, 86.0 above their average of 59.0 on all balls faced (+146%) — allowing for sample size, that change is in the top 5% of comparable players (their median change: +6%) — 168 balls faced.
168 ballsLow confidence

Weaknesses(8)

Old ball (21-80)
Match phase · strike rate
6th pct.
This split
48.34
Own baseline
56.03
Cohort median
49.33
6th percentile among comparable players
Old ball (21-80): strike rate of 48.3, 7.7 below their strike rate of 56.0 on all balls faced (-14%) — allowing for sample size, that change is in the bottom 6% of comparable players (their median change: -1%) — 631 balls faced.
631 ballsHigh confidence
Pace
Pace or spin · average
7th pct.
This split
42.25
Own baseline
59.00
Cohort median
29.05
7th percentile among comparable players
Pace: average of 42.2, 16.8 below their average of 59.0 on all balls faced (-28%) — allowing for sample size, that change is in the bottom 7% of comparable players (their median change: -5%) — 611 balls faced.

Percentile profile

Where each measure ranks among comparable players; 50 is the cohort median.

View as table

Percentile profile
Measure	Value	Percentile	Balls
Run scoring (batting)	59.00	99	1,053
Scoring rate (batting)	56.03	73	1,053
Against pace (batting)	42.25	88	611
Against spin (batting)	126.00	100	442
Time at the crease (batting)	105.30	97	1,053
Boundary hitting (batting)	7.88	81	1,053
Strike rotation (batting)	72.93	58	1,053

Batting matchups

Against each bowling type and family, by phase of the innings, and by how long the batter has been in.

Bowling type
Bowling type	Balls	Runs	Outs	Avg	SR	Dot %	4s+6s %
Right-arm fast-medium	346	184	5	36.80	53.18	74.6%	9.0%
Leg break	317	158	1	158.00	49.84	75.1%	6.6%
Right-arm fast	129	76	3	25.33	58.91	64.3%	4.7%
Left-arm fast-medium	117	71	0	–	60.68	76.1%	11.1%
Off break	74	54	0	–	72.97	67.6%	9.5%

Pace or spin
Pace or spin	Balls	Runs	Outs	Avg	SR	Dot %	4s+6s %
Pace	611	338	8	42.25	55.32	73.2%	8.3%

Career by year

Runs in each calendar year; the table below has every figure and the innings behind it.

View as table

Career by year
Year	Inns	Runs	Avg	SR	Bowl inns	Wkts	Bowl avg	Econ
2003	1	106	106.00	46.70	–	–	–	–
2005	7	447	63.86	58.97	–	–	–	–
2007	2	37	18.50	54.41	–	–	–	–

Recent form

The last innings in this format, next to the career figures.

Last 10 innings batting: 590runs, 10 dismissalsAverage 59.00 (career 59.00) · strike rate 56.03 (career 56.03) · 16 Oct 2003 to 16 Nov 2007

Recent batting innings

Recent batting innings
Date	Opposition	Runs	Balls	4s	6s	Pos	Dismissal
16 Nov 2007	South AfricaSuperSport Park, Centurion	4	4	1	0	1	lbw
16 Nov 2007	South AfricaSuperSport Park, Centurion	33	64	4	1	3	caught
15 Aug 2005	ZimbabweQueens Sports Club, Bulawayo	92	129	14	1	2	bowled
7 Aug 2005	ZimbabweHarare Sports Club	13	25	3	0

Dismissals

How they got out

10 dismissals

Lbw440%
Caught330%
Bowled220%
Run out110%

Dismissed by bowling type

10 dismissals where the bowler's type is known

Right-arm fast-medium550%
Right-arm fast330%

Measure

Value

Percentile

Balls

Run scoring (batting)

59.00

1,053

Scoring rate (batting)

56.03

1,053

Against pace (batting)

42.25

611

Against spin (batting)

126.00

100

442

Time at the crease (batting)

105.30

1,053

Boundary hitting (batting)

7.88

1,053

Strike rotation (batting)

72.93

1,053

Bowling type

Balls

Runs

Outs

Avg

Dot %

4s+6s %

Right-arm fast-medium

346

184

36.80

53.18

74.6%

9.0%

Leg break

317

158

158.00

49.84

75.1%

6.6%

Right-arm fast

129

25.33

58.91

64.3%

4.7%

Left-arm fast-medium

117

–

60.68

76.1%

11.1%

Off break

–

72.97

67.6%

9.5%

Pace or spin

Balls

Runs

Outs

Avg

Dot %

4s+6s %

Pace

611

338

42.25

55.32

73.2%

8.3%

Year

Inns

Runs

Avg

Bowl inns

Wkts

Bowl avg

Econ

2003

106

106.00

46.70

–

2005

447

63.86

58.97

–

2007

18.50

54.41

–

Date

Opposition

Runs

Balls

Pos

Dismissal

16 Nov 2007

South AfricaSuperSport Park, Centurion

lbw

16 Nov 2007

South AfricaSuperSport Park, Centurion

caught

15 Aug 2005

ZimbabweQueens Sports Club, Bulawayo

129

bowled

7 Aug 2005

ZimbabweHarare Sports Club

Type and phase	Balls	Runs	Outs	Avg	SR	Dot %	4s+6s %
Leg break, Old ball (21-80)	250	99	1	99.00	39.60	79.6%	5.2%
Right-arm fast-medium, New ball (1-20)	158	90	2	45.00	56.96	72.2%	9.5%
Right-arm fast-medium, Old ball (21-80)	155	79	2	39.50	50.97	76.8%	9.0%
Off break, Old ball (21-80)	61	35	0	–	57.38	72.1%	6.6%

Stage of innings	Balls	Runs	Outs	Avg	SR	Dot %	4s+6s %
Once set (40+ balls)	742	440	6	73.33	59.30	71.0%	8.1%
Settling in (balls 16-40)	178	80	2	40.00	44.94	78.1%	6.7%
New at the crease (first 15 balls)	133	70	2	35.00	52.63	76.7%	8.3%

Home and chase	Balls	Runs	Outs	Avg	SR	Dot %	4s+6s %
At home	604	342	5	68.40	56.62	71.9%	7.1%
Away from home	449	248	5	49.60	55.23	74.4%	8.9%

Batting position	Balls	Runs	Outs	Avg	SR	Dot %	4s+6s %
No. 2	381	211	3	70.33	55.38	73.8%	8.9%
No. 3	64	33	1	33.00	51.56	78.1%	7.8%
No. 4	604	342	5	68.40	56.62	71.9%	7.1%

Innings	Balls	Runs	Outs	Avg	SR	Dot %	4s+6s %
Innings 2	641	379	3	126.33	59.13	70.5%	7.8%
Innings 1	366	179	4	44.75	48.91	77.6%	7.9%

L Vincent

Career by format

Strengths and weaknesses

Strengths(8)

Weaknesses(8)

Percentile profile

Batting matchups

Career by year

Recent form

Recent batting innings

Dismissals

How they got out

Dismissed by bowling type

Strengths and weaknesses

Strengths(8)

Weaknesses(8)

Percentile profile

Batting matchups

Career by year

Recent form

Recent batting innings

Dismissals

How they got out

Dismissed by bowling type

Batting by context

Head to head with bowlers

Phase	Balls	Runs	Outs	Avg	SR	Dot %	4s+6s %
Old ball (21-80)	631	305	5	61.00	48.34	76.4%	6.5%
New ball (1-20)	254	140	4	35.00	55.12	73.2%	8.7%
Second new ball (81+)	168	145	1	145.00	86.31	59.5%	11.9%

Opposition	Balls	Runs	Outs	Avg	SR	Dot %	4s+6s %
Sri Lanka	348	224	1	224.00	64.37	68.4%	8.3%
Australia	256	118	4	29.50	46.09	76.6%	5.5%
India	227	106	1	106.00	46.70	77.1%	7.0%
Zimbabwe	154	105	2	52.50	68.18	68.8%	11.7%
South Africa	68	37	2	18.50	54.41	77.9%	8.8%

Venue	Balls	Runs	Outs	Avg	SR	Dot %	4s+6s %
Basin Reserve	545	311	3	103.67	57.06	70.8%	6.8%
Punjab Cricket Association Stadium	227	106	1	106.00	46.70	77.1%	7.0%
Queens Sports Club	129	92	1	92.00	71.32	67.4%	11.6%
SuperSport Park	68	37	2	18.50	54.41	77.9%	8.8%

Host country	Balls	Runs	Outs	Avg	SR	Dot %	4s+6s %
New Zealand	604	342	5	68.40	56.62	71.9%	7.1%
India	227	106	1	106.00	46.70	77.1%	7.0%
Zimbabwe	154	105

Bowler	Balls	Runs	Outs	Avg	SR	Dot %	4s+6s %
SK Warne	104	39	0	–	37.50	79.8%	4.8%
UDU Chandana	102	60	0	–	58.82	70.6%	7.8%
A Kumble	72	27	1	27.00	37.50	79.2%	4.2%
MS Kasprowicz	69	38	2	19.00	55.07	73.9%	8.7%
SL Malinga	65	43	0	–	66.15	52.3%	3.1%
WPUJC Vaas	65	48	0	–	73.85	70.8%	12.3%
MF Maharoof	61	27	1	27.00	44.26	77.0%	6.6%

Career by format

Men's Test analysis

Strengths and weaknesses

▲Strengths(8)

▼Weaknesses(8)

Percentile profile

Batting matchups

Career by year

Recent form

Recent batting innings

Dismissals

How they got out

Dismissed by bowling type

Strengths and weaknesses

▲Strengths(8)

▼Weaknesses(8)

Percentile profile

Batting matchups

Career by year

Recent form

Recent batting innings

Dismissals

How they got out

Dismissed by bowling type

Batting by context

Head to head with bowlers

Strengths(8)

Weaknesses(8)

Strengths(8)

Weaknesses(8)