West Indies
Opposition · average
90th pct.- This split
- 87.50
- Own baseline
- 48.74
- Cohort median
- 33.77
90th percentile among comparable players
0median100
West Indies: average of 87.5, 38.8 above their average of 48.7 on all balls faced (+80%) — allowing for sample size, that change is in the top 11% of comparable players (their median change: +5%) — 643 balls faced.
643 ballsHigh confidence
Old ball (21-80)
Match phase · strike rate
89th pct.- This split
- 60.90
- Own baseline
- 57.09
- Cohort median
- 49.33
89th percentile among comparable players
0median100
Old ball (21-80): strike rate of 60.9, 3.8 above their strike rate of 57.1 on all balls faced (+7%) — allowing for sample size, that change is in the top 11% of comparable players (their median change: -1%) — 1504 balls faced.
1,504 ballsHigh confidence
New at the crease (first 15 balls)
Stage of innings · balls per dismissal
85th pct.- This split
- 101.14
- Own baseline
- 85.38
- Cohort median
- 57.03
85th percentile among comparable players
0median100
New at the crease (first 15 balls): balls per dismissal of 101, 16 above their balls per dismissal of 85 on all balls faced (+18%) — allowing for sample size, that change is in the top 15% of comparable players (their median change: -6%) — 708 balls faced.
708 ballsHigh confidence
South Africa
Opposition · average
84th pct.- This split
- 60.75
- Own baseline
- 48.74
- Cohort median
- 28.50
84th percentile among comparable players
0median100
South Africa: average of 60.8, 12.0 above their average of 48.7 on all balls faced (+25%) — allowing for sample size, that change is in the top 16% of comparable players (their median change: -9%) — 863 balls faced.
863 ballsHigh confidence
Bangladesh
Opposition · average
79th pct.- This split
- 89.25
- Own baseline
- 48.74
- Cohort median
- 38.87
79th percentile among comparable players
0median100
Bangladesh: average of 89.2, 40.5 above their average of 48.7 on all balls faced (+83%) — allowing for sample size, that change is in the top 21% of comparable players (their median change: +22%) — 492 balls faced.
492 ballsHigh confidence
Leg break
Bowling type · strike rate
96th pct.- This split
- 79.79
- Own baseline
- 57.09
- Cohort median
- 53.01
96th percentile among comparable players
0median100
Leg break: strike rate of 79.8, 22.7 above their strike rate of 57.1 on all balls faced (+40%) — allowing for sample size, that change is in the top 5% of comparable players (their median change: +4%) — 292 balls faced.
292 ballsMedium confidence
Slow left-arm orthodox
Bowling type · strike rate
95th pct.- This split
- 77.37
- Own baseline
- 57.09
- Cohort median
- 47.74
95th percentile among comparable players
0median100
Slow left-arm orthodox: strike rate of 77.4, 20.3 above their strike rate of 57.1 on all balls faced (+36%) — allowing for sample size, that change is in the top 5% of comparable players (their median change: -4%) — 243 balls faced.
243 ballsMedium confidence
Slow left-arm orthodox
Bowling type · average
86th pct.- This split
- 94.00
- Own baseline
- 48.74
- Cohort median
- 31.70
86th percentile among comparable players
0median100
Slow left-arm orthodox: average of 94.0, 45.3 above their average of 48.7 on all balls faced (+93%) — allowing for sample size, that change is in the top 14% of comparable players (their median change: +2%) — 243 balls faced.
243 ballsMedium confidence
Left-arm fast-medium
Bowling type · average
75th pct.- This split
- 65.00
- Own baseline
- 48.74
- Cohort median
- 32.31
75th percentile among comparable players
0median100
Left-arm fast-medium: average of 65.0, 16.3 above their average of 48.7 on all balls faced (+33%) — allowing for sample size, that change is in the top 25% of comparable players (their median change: -1%) — 254 balls faced.
254 ballsMedium confidence
Second new ball (81+)
Match phase · strike rate
87th pct.- This split
- 73.53
- Own baseline
- 57.09
- Cohort median
- 53.32
87th percentile among comparable players
0median100
Second new ball (81+): strike rate of 73.5, 16.4 above their strike rate of 57.1 on all balls faced (+29%) — allowing for sample size, that change is in the top 13% of comparable players (their median change: +4%) — 204 balls faced.
204 ballsLow confidence
Second new ball (81+)
Match phase · average
82nd pct.- This split
- 75.00
- Own baseline
- 48.74
- Cohort median
- 34.23
82nd percentile among comparable players
0median100
Second new ball (81+): average of 75.0, 26.3 above their average of 48.7 on all balls faced (+54%) — allowing for sample size, that change is in the top 18% of comparable players (their median change: +6%) — 204 balls faced.
204 ballsLow confidence