Settling in (balls 16-40)
Stage of innings · balls per dismissal
90th pct.- This split
- 62.00
- Own baseline
- 42.33
- Cohort median
- 40.58
90th percentile among comparable players
0median100
Settling in (balls 16-40): balls per dismissal of 62, 20 above their balls per dismissal of 42 on all balls faced (+46%) — allowing for sample size, that change is in the top 10% of comparable players (their median change: +3%) — 496 balls faced.
496 ballsHigh confidence
Middle (11-40)
Match phase · economy
77th pct.- This split
- 5.29
- Own baseline
- 5.73
- Cohort median
- 4.93
77th percentile among comparable players
0median100
Middle (11-40): economy of 5.29, 0.44 below their economy of 5.73 on all balls bowled (-8%) — allowing for sample size, that change is in the top 23% of comparable players (their median change: -3%) — 1072 balls bowled.
1,072 ballsHigh confidence
Middle (11-40)
Match phase · average
72nd pct.- This split
- 42.65
- Own baseline
- 36.27
- Cohort median
- 34.39
72nd percentile among comparable players
0median100
Middle (11-40): average of 42.6, 6.4 above their average of 36.3 on all balls faced (+18%) — allowing for sample size, that change is in the top 28% of comparable players (their median change: +7%) — 1056 balls faced.
1,056 ballsHigh confidence
Left-handed batters
Batter hand · average
76th pct.- This split
- 27.93
- Own baseline
- 33.06
- Cohort median
- 33.84
76th percentile among comparable players
0median100
Left-handed batters: average of 27.9, 5.1 below their average of 33.1 on all balls bowled (-15%) — allowing for sample size, that change is in the top 24% of comparable players (their median change: +2%) — 426 balls bowled.
426 ballsMedium confidence
Right-arm medium
Bowling type · strike rate
98th pct.- This split
- 113.64
- Own baseline
- 85.68
- Cohort median
- 82.60
98th percentile among comparable players
0median100
Right-arm medium: strike rate of 113.6, 28.0 above their strike rate of 85.7 on all balls faced (+33%) — allowing for sample size, that change is in the top 2% of comparable players (their median change: +2%) — 198 balls faced.
198 ballsLow confidence
England
Opposition · average
94th pct.- This split
- 68.00
- Own baseline
- 36.27
- Cohort median
- 33.52
94th percentile among comparable players
0median100
England: average of 68.0, 31.7 above their average of 36.3 on all balls faced (+87%) — allowing for sample size, that change is in the top 6% of comparable players (their median change: -1%) — 219 balls faced.
219 ballsLow confidence
Powerplay (1-10)
Match phase · average
93rd pct.- This split
- 62.50
- Own baseline
- 36.27
- Cohort median
- 31.53
93rd percentile among comparable players
0median100
Powerplay (1-10): average of 62.5, 26.2 above their average of 36.3 on all balls faced (+72%) — allowing for sample size, that change is in the top 7% of comparable players (their median change: -6%) — 178 balls faced.
178 ballsLow confidence
Zimbabwe
Country · average
86th pct.- This split
- 20.91
- Own baseline
- 33.06
- Cohort median
- 31.73
86th percentile among comparable players
0median100
Zimbabwe: average of 20.9, 12.1 below their average of 33.1 on all balls bowled (-37%) — allowing for sample size, that change is in the top 14% of comparable players (their median change: -4%) — 276 balls bowled.
276 ballsLow confidence
- This split
- 46.80
- Own baseline
- 36.27
- Cohort median
- 28.93
75th percentile among comparable players
0median100
Namibia: average of 46.8, 10.5 above their average of 36.3 on all balls faced (+29%) — allowing for sample size, that change is in the top 25% of comparable players (their median change: -2%) — 201 balls faced.
201 ballsLow confidence
Namibia
Opposition · average
71st pct.- This split
- 46.80
- Own baseline
- 36.27
- Cohort median
- 29.84
71st percentile among comparable players
0median100
Namibia: average of 46.8, 10.5 above their average of 36.3 on all balls faced (+29%) — allowing for sample size, that change is in the top 29% of comparable players (their median change: +2%) — 201 balls faced.
201 ballsLow confidence